Parsing Grammer Expressions and Specifications

Table of Contents

Peggy

https://peggyjs.org/

If we have to validate expressions on the UI, this is an option. Using this, we can write grammer in a file, set-up a command in package.json of the UI application to generate javascript code from the grammer file and use the generated javascript code for things like validation on the UI, etc.

The other option is to write the validation function in a backend application and use a http call to the backend application to do the validation.

How do other languages handle what javascript peggy does?

Peggy.js is a parser generator specifically for JavaScript, based on the Parsing Expression Grammar (PEG) formalism. It allows developers to define a grammar for a language (like a programming language, data format, or domain-specific language) and then automatically generates a parser that can recognize and process text conforming to that grammar.

Other languages handle parsing in various ways, often with similar tools and concepts to what Peggy.js provides, but tailored to their specific ecosystems:

1. Parser Generators (Similar to Peggy.js):

Many languages have their own parser generators, which take a formal grammar description and generate parser code in that language. These can be based on various parsing algorithms, including PEGs, LL(k), LR(k), LALR(k), etc.

  1. ANTLR (ANother Tool for Language Recognition): This is one of the most popular and powerful parser generators. It supports generating parsers in multiple target languages, including Java, C#, Python, JavaScript, C++, Swift, Go, and PHP. ANTLR uses an Adaptive LL(*) algorithm, which is very flexible.
  2. Bison/Yacc (and their derivatives): These are traditional parser generators, originating in the C/C++ world. They generate LALR(1) parsers, which are widely used for programming languages. Many languages have tools inspired by or directly porting Yacc/Bison concepts (e.g., Jison for JavaScript, Ruby’s use of Bison).
  3. JavaCC: A parser generator for Java that generates LL(k) parsers.
  4. Lark (Python): A powerful and flexible parser generator for Python, supporting LALR(1) and Earley parsing.
  5. LPeg (Lua): LPeg (Lua Parsing Expression Grammars) is a pattern-matching library for Lua based on PEGs. Instead of generating separate code, it allows you to define patterns directly within Lua.
  6. Other PEG Implementations: Just as Peggy.js is a PEG-based parser generator for JavaScript, many other languages have libraries or tools that implement PEGs. For example, Python’s CPython interpreter (since version 3.9) now uses a PEG-based parser internally. Emacs Lisp also has built-in support for PEGs.

2. Handwritten Parsers:

For many major programming languages, the parsers are often handwritten rather than generated by tools. This approach offers maximum control and optimization, but it’s also more complex and time-consuming to develop and maintain.

  1. Examples: The parsers for languages like C (in GCC and Clang), Java (OpenJDK), Go, C#, TypeScript, and Swift are typically handwritten. This often involves recursive descent parsing, where each grammar rule corresponds to a function that attempts to parse a specific part of the input.

3. Parser Combinator Libraries:

Some languages offer “parser combinator” libraries. Instead of a separate grammar file, you define parsing rules as functions or objects within the language itself, and then combine these smaller parsers to build more complex ones. This approach is often favored in functional programming languages.

  1. While not strictly “parser generators” in the sense of generating separate code, they provide a very similar declarative way to define parsing logic.

Key Differences and Considerations:

  1. Formalism: The underlying formal grammar (Context-Free Grammars - CFGs, Parsing Expression Grammars - PEGs, etc.) dictates how the language can be described and the parsing algorithm used. PEGs, for instance, have ordered choice and are unambiguous by nature, which can simplify grammar definition compared to CFGs in some cases.
  2. Output: Parser generators like Peggy.js produce executable code (e.g., a JavaScript file). Parser combinators are libraries used directly in the code.
  3. Language Integration: Some tools are tightly integrated into the language’s build system and IDEs, offering better tooling support (e.g., syntax highlighting for grammar files, error reporting).
  4. Performance vs. Development Speed: Handwritten parsers can often be highly optimized for performance, but take longer to write. Parser generators and combinators generally prioritize development speed and ease of maintenance, though generated parsers can still be very fast (like those using packrat parsing for PEGs).
  5. Error Reporting: A good parser (whether generated or handwritten) provides helpful error messages when the input doesn’t conform to the grammar.

In essence, while the specific tools and implementations vary, the fundamental problem of parsing and the general approaches to solving it (grammar definition, code generation, or direct implementation) are common across many programming languages. Peggy.js provides a JavaScript-native way to leverage the power of Parsing Expression Grammars, a technique that has analogues and direct implementations in numerous other language environments.

Tools similar to javascript peggy

Peggy.js (formerly PEG.js) is a JavaScript parser generator based on Parsing Expression Grammars (PEGs). If you’re looking for similar tools, you’ll generally find them falling into a few categories:

1. Other JavaScript Parser Generators (and related tools):

These are direct alternatives if your target language is still JavaScript:

  1. Jison: Inspired by Bison/Yacc, Jison generates LALR(1) parsers. It’s a good choice for projects that need a straightforward parser generator with a more traditional CFG (Context-Free Grammar) approach than PEGs.
  2. Nearley: A powerful and fast parsing library for JavaScript that uses Earley parsing. It’s more flexible than Peggy.js, capable of handling ambiguous grammars (though PEGs are inherently unambiguous). If you have a complex or potentially ambiguous grammar, Nearley might be a better fit.
  3. Ohm.js: A JavaScript library for parsing and matching. It separates grammar definition (syntax) from actions (semantics), which can lead to cleaner code. Ohm is built on PEGs.
  4. Chevrotain: Not a grammar-based parser generator in the same vein as Peggy.js or Jison, but rather a Parsing DSL (Domain Specific Language) for JavaScript. You write your parser directly in JavaScript using its API, which provides a high degree of control and can be very performant. It’s often used when you want to avoid a separate grammar file and have more imperative control over the parsing process.
  5. Parsimmon: A parser combinator library for JavaScript. This approach lets you build parsers by combining smaller, simple parsers into more complex ones, all within your JavaScript code. It’s a more functional approach to parsing and is generally good for smaller, less complex grammars.

2. Parser Generators for Other Languages (often supporting PEGs or similar formalisms):

If you’re not strictly tied to JavaScript, or you’re building a parser for a language that will eventually target other platforms, these are widely used and powerful:

  1. ANTLR (ANother Tool for Language Recognition): One of the most popular and versatile parser generators. It supports generating parsers in numerous languages (Java, C#, Python, JavaScript, C++, Swift, Go, PHP, etc.). ANTLR uses an Adaptive LL(*) algorithm, which is very flexible and powerful. While not strictly PEG-based, it can often achieve similar results for many grammars.
  2. Bison/Yacc (and their derivatives): The classic parser generators, traditionally for C/C++. Many languages have “Yacc-like” tools or bindings. They generate LALR(1) parsers, which are widely used for programming language frontends.
    • PLY (Python Lex-Yacc): A Python implementation of Lex and Yacc.
    • Happy (Haskell): A Yacc-like parser generator for Haskell.
  3. JavaCC: A parser generator for Java that generates LL(k) parsers.
  4. Lark (Python): A modern and very capable parser generator for Python, supporting LALR(1), Earley, and other algorithms.
  5. LPeg (Lua): A pattern-matching library for Lua based on PEGs. It’s unique in that it allows you to define PEG patterns directly within Lua, rather than generating separate code.
  6. PEGTL (C++): A C++ header-only parser combinator library for creating parsers based on Parsing Expression Grammars. It allows you to write grammars directly in C++ using template programming.
  7. Rust Parsing Libraries (e.g., Nom, LALRPOP, Combine): Rust has a vibrant ecosystem for parsing. `Nom` is a popular parser combinator library, while `LALRPOP` is an LALR(1) parser generator.

When choosing a tool, consider:

  1. Target Language: What language do you want the generated parser or the parsing logic to be in?
  2. Grammar Complexity: How complex is the language you’re trying to parse? Simple domain-specific languages might be fine with a parser combinator, while a full programming language likely needs a powerful parser generator.
  3. Parsing Algorithm: Do you have specific requirements for the parsing algorithm (e.g., PEG for inherent unambiguousness, LL/LR for traditional compiler design)?
  4. Error Reporting and Recovery: How important is it for the parser to provide good error messages and recover gracefully from syntax errors?
  5. Tooling and Ecosystem: How mature is the tool? Does it have good documentation, community support, and integration with IDEs or build systems?
  6. Performance: For very high-throughput parsing, performance can be a significant factor.

Peggy.js is a solid choice for JavaScript projects that benefit from the clarity and unambiguous nature of PEGs. However, the world of parsing tools is vast, with many excellent options available depending on your specific needs and preferred programming language.

Links to this note